[octotoad]

I wonder how much of Mark Shuttleworth's personal funding is still at play in keeping Canonical alive.

A quick web search returns articles claiming the company has been profitable since 2018 and that an IPO may be in the works. I can understand how something like Red Hat has managed to survive over the past twenty years, given the name it has built for itself in the "enterprise" Linux world (for better or worse), but Canonical continuing to operate off the back of Ubuntu has always baffled me.

[WastingMyTime89]

Ubuntu has been the most popular Linux distribution for nearly 20 years. Are you surprised that translates in support contracts in the enterprise world?

It isn’t to me. People keep using what they are familiar with on their servers. Plus it’s one of the default option at most hosting provider.

[jabl]

To an extent, I actually am. Redhat became successful because they went after and conquered the "replace expensive proprietary unix risc server with x86+Linux but still want a support contract for CYA reasons and that's how we do it in the enterprise world".

Ubuntu is wildly popular on desktops and in the cloud (and largely for good reasons, all the phone-home and marketing etc. aside, it's a solid and polished distro), but I expect a vanishingly small fraction of Ubuntu users actually pay a dime to Canonical. Now Canonical has been trying to monetize Ubuntu in various ways over the years, some better and some worse, but I do hope they succeed so that Ubuntu is long term sustainable.

[pxc]

> People keep using what they are familiar with on their server.

Nobody learning Linux for the first time today is excited about Ubuntu.

I wonder if this will seriously erode Canonical's position in the Enterprise market, or if they're sufficiently entrenched to just coast for another generation.