top | item 35046885

(no title)

22SAS | 3 years ago

[flagged]

discuss

order

seatac76|3 years ago

Did you even read the article? It seems well researched, if anything it alludes to the uncertainty inherent in determining with accuracy what happened centuries ago.

Bang2Bay|3 years ago

everything is propaganda. Including painting nationalists as those behind these articles. :)

Unfortunately no one wants to research because many tame any research as rightwing propaganda.

No research has been done as to how an 80ton stone was moved 100s of km and lifted 20 stories up to build temples for example.

sbmthakur|3 years ago

Is BBC following Hindu nationalist propaganda?

SeanLuke|3 years ago

Actually a fair bit of the BBC article appears to have been derived from Wikipedia.

Bang2Bay|3 years ago

that is what most want us to believe or argue about. :)

22SAS|3 years ago

[deleted]

steponlego|3 years ago

Why wouldn’t Hindus have a country? Muslims got two in the partition.

vinay427|3 years ago

Assuming you mean Pakistan and Bangladesh, the latter was not formed in the partition and was a province of Pakistan.

22SAS|3 years ago

What does my post have to do with Hindus having/not having a land of their own?

shaan7|3 years ago

[deleted]