[aarpmcgee]

We all have addictions. For some it is substances, other relationships, power, sex, gambling, food, etc. What if yours suddenly became really difficult to manage within the societal-framework-du-jour? Just don't start doing it?

[emodendroket]

I think it's trivializing the concept to say "we all have addictions," since by definition an addiction is meant to be a significant impediment to living a normal life. And I'm not sure how you're answering the concern here. Like yeah, a lot of people get addicted to gambling -- that's a compelling argument against legalizing gambling.

[aarpmcgee]

My point was more an attempt to point at an empathetic response as a possibility. "don't start abusing the drug in the first place", to me, felt like a way to dismiss the reality that it can be really easy to fall into addiction, because most of us are broken in our own peculiar ways and have our own vulnerabilities. What if someone else's response to one's own brokenness was "just don't do that"? It doesn't really help much, because the reasons for it are valid, and the need itself needs to be seen.

My own comment was a knee-jerk reactive comment in reply to what I felt in your post, which may or may not have been a real thing.

Idk. My hunch is that we are all addicted to something, and if you don't see what it is yet, then either you or society (or both) must not have much of a problem with that particular addiction, and that can always change.

[TomSwirly]

> since by definition an addiction is meant to be a significant impediment to living a normal life.

Wrong.

The definition of addiction is "physically and mentally dependent on a particular substance." (Oxford Dictionary)

I am addicted to coffee. I get mild physical withdrawal symptoms if I quit. In no way is it an impediment to living my normal life.

[Godel_unicode]

Citation very much needed.