(no title)
collectedparts | 3 years ago
Exchanges that offer true "USD" trading pairs ultimately have to store that cash [at a bank] somewhere. But at which bank? Before this week, most people probably wouldn't have paid attention.
Some like Coinbase offer passthrough FDIC insurance [1], but again, if you have more than $250k you're potentially s-o-l just like an SVB depositor.
So weirdly, 1 USDT ("definitely sketchy but somehow has never broken peg") all of a sudden may seem less risky than 1 "USD" at [which bank again?].
deepsun|3 years ago
But all past stablecoins never broken the peg before they did.
KaiserPro|3 years ago
that's not it. there are far better gauges of dissatisfaction in US banking, share price in banks is a far better gauge. if you want a metric for USD then swiss franc is better.
USDC and other "stable coins" are risky, noisy and generally bad medium to long term investments. Unlike domestic currency they have such small trading volumes that they are easy to manipulate.
Thats great if you're the one doing the manipulation. At best they perform better than cash, but without any of the protection, at worst they go bust. Emerging markets have less fraud than generic crypto backed devices.
capableweb|3 years ago
How are you supposed to manipulate a currency pegged to the USD? It'll fluctuate a bit above or below, but not by much except in extreme cases. And even in those extreme cases, it seems like the peg gets restored eventually. Talking mainly about USDC, USDT and DAI here, as those have all been "depegged" and subsequently restored their peg afterwards.
mrcggl|3 years ago
Also the trading volume of stablecoins and of the largest cryptocurrencies is close on most day to NASDAQ's listed equities trading volume.
Eisenstein|3 years ago
Felminor|3 years ago
threeseed|3 years ago
One that has adequate risk management controls, attempts to comply with Basel 3 etc.
unknown|3 years ago
[deleted]