top | item 35121450

(no title)

nhchris | 3 years ago

> shouting down students who raised questions with civility

Sounds awful. Is there video?

discuss

order

spamizbad|3 years ago

Here's one video: https://twitter.com/chrisgeidner/status/1634791941350064128?...

This is going to be a super unpopular take so feel free to let me have it (I won't hold it against you):

I don't know why anyone would expect a bunch of Stanford students to be bowled over by some appointed midwit judge.

Your typical Stanford student, assuming they're not a legacy, is extremely hard-working and bright. Top of their class. Whereas your typical judge is a mediocre lawyer who happened to be a known commodity among oily politicians. The idea that we sneer at our best college students but celebrate mediocre jurists isn't reflective of a meritocratic society.

scarmig|3 years ago

There's something... interesting about ostensible egalitarians (equitytarians?) saying that someone is worthy of less respect because they went to LSU instead of an elite school like Stanford.

How they acted toward the guest would be inappropriate even if he were an ex-homeless high school dropout. If he's a midwit, embarrass him by asking pointed questions, not by heckling and hurling insults.

pxmpxm|3 years ago

Well the point of contention isn't the stances being discussed, but rather that a group of ostensibly top-law intellectuals behaving like a mob of room-temp-iq occupy wallst idiots. All feelz, devoid of thought.

slibhb|3 years ago

I don't expect the students to be "bowled over" by a judge. I expect them not to heckle him.

You seem to be saying the treatment is justified because the students are smarter than the judge.

engineer_22|3 years ago

He was invited to speak by Stanford students, so at least a minority of hard-working and bright students wanted to hear what he had to say.

nhchris|3 years ago

In that video he calmly replies "You're an appalling idiot" to the person calling him* "disgusting". I was more interested in the alleged shouting at civil questions.

*Correction: The student is calling what he's doing disgusting, not the man himself.

> Your typical Stanford student, assuming they're not a legacy, is extremely hard-working and bright. Top of their class. Whereas your typical judge is a mediocre lawyer who happened to be a known commodity among oily politicians.

The typical judge, perhaps, but Duncan [0] graduated summa cum laude [1] from Louisiana State University, which seems to be well regarded, and earned a Master of Laws from Columbia Law School, which is "widely regarded as one of the most prestigious law schools in the world and has always ranked in the top five schools in the United States" [2].

But more pertinent is engineer_22's comment [3] that he was invited to speak by some of those students you think so highly of.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyle_Duncan_(judge)

[1] meaning "with highest praise", typically awarded to graduates in the top 1%, 2%, or 5% of their class - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_honors#Distinctions

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia_Law_School

[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35121972