top | item 35128867 (no title) lambic2 | 3 years ago Source for this? All evidence show that their failure at least started with them owning a lot of "safe" bonds, whose value declined with increasing fed rates. discuss order hn newest mbesto|3 years ago https://www.svb.com/landing-pages/venture-debt mbesto|3 years ago To elaborate further with hard numbers. See #2:https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rich-falk-wallace_silicon-val...#1: Mortgage backed securities: $82B (83% residential) #2: Direct loans: $74B (55% short term loans to VCs & PE) #3: Liquid assets: $55B
mbesto|3 years ago https://www.svb.com/landing-pages/venture-debt mbesto|3 years ago To elaborate further with hard numbers. See #2:https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rich-falk-wallace_silicon-val...#1: Mortgage backed securities: $82B (83% residential) #2: Direct loans: $74B (55% short term loans to VCs & PE) #3: Liquid assets: $55B
mbesto|3 years ago To elaborate further with hard numbers. See #2:https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rich-falk-wallace_silicon-val...#1: Mortgage backed securities: $82B (83% residential) #2: Direct loans: $74B (55% short term loans to VCs & PE) #3: Liquid assets: $55B
mbesto|3 years ago
mbesto|3 years ago
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rich-falk-wallace_silicon-val...
#1: Mortgage backed securities: $82B (83% residential) #2: Direct loans: $74B (55% short term loans to VCs & PE) #3: Liquid assets: $55B