top | item 35137605

(no title)

dfragnito | 3 years ago

The focus is on value prop. and yes the docs are lacking.

Your feedback to include a comparison of our language to SQL is good. I was hoping the breakdown of the "shop admin" demo detailed the semantics of the language but looks like that it did not work for you.

The thought was that by going through the examples with the free trial one could get up top speed with SFSQL, but maybe a more formal introduction to the language is needed.

For reasons beyond our control Eric is not available for commenting at this time. He not wanting to take credit for the demos was more of a joke. Non trivial client work we have produced with SFSQL is not available for public review. I wanted public demos so I made them also to show how a novice can hook up a back-end with SFSQL sorry it came off as weird.

Also sorry we could not peak your curiosity a bit more, we will do better.

discuss

jitl|3 years ago

Compare your approach to EdgeDB - https://www.edgedb.com/. They have a similar product - SQL alternative but not NoSQL. Their homepage is also a little long, but has clear examples.

dfragnito|3 years ago

Yes I see what you mean by "infomercial" when comparing SFSQL to EdgeDb. Was not our intention, its a work in progress. Will make the needed changes, thanks again for feedback.