[markdoubleyou]

The problem is that they don't blatantly violate any of the policy bullets in that FTC press release... all the terms are spelled out in the interstitial. The issue is that the design goes out of its way to give it a very mandatory vibe. I don't log in very often, but I always have to catch myself ("...wait, what is this? Do I have to do this?"), and then remember to go hunting for the NoThanks button. It has a very opt-out feel.

[toomuchtodo]

Let the regulator evaluate if they want to take action. Not filing a complaint guarantees no action will be taken. Filing the complaint takes <5 min. My two cents.

[markdoubleyou]

Fair enough, it's filed.

[prawn]

I'd guess that if they get a lot of reports, they will generally pay closer attention to that entity.

The consumer commission in Australia openly notes that there are lots of individual cases with which they can't assist, but still request reports regardless. Helps them keep a finger on the pulse.

[atlasunshrugged]

Do you work with the FTC?

I also agree though, 1) can't hurt, 2) the FTC is actively going after folks who are using dark patterns

https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/09/...

[sneak]

> Not filing a complaint guarantees no action will be taken.

What a lousy system of regulation, then.

I feel like you'd be more effective finding someone (or twenty someones) that work in their IT department on LinkedIn and explaining to them that working to enrich such an outfit is a scumbag move.

Hit them where it hurts. Government regulators are not it for these fully integrated parasites.

[lozenge]

I wonder if the washed out text meets AAA guidelines? If not it could be argued it's effectively invisible for some users.