Like NsCDE [1], these kinds of old school environments are nice an all until you fire up a modern browser or an app made for Gnome and you end up in a kind of aesthetic mess.
This might be a previously unknown bit of NeXT and Windows history.
While Windows 3 was in development I was in the next building working on os/2. (not bragging <g>)
I spent a lot of time in a lab that had a lot of hardware. One day a NeXT machine showed up in the lab.
The next day there was a line of Windows developers waiting for their chance too look at it. (we'll forget the fun I had grabbing a screen shot of the desktop which i then left displayed full screen)
It was a mere matter of days before a build of Windows with 3d buttons came out, and the rest is more history.
Have you asked for the sources? GPL does not require proactive distribution, that's just the common way people avoid handling many individual requests.
Plan 9 for NeXT works well in Previous with a 9p server running on the emulation host or a different machine on the net. Previous support for NeXTstep includes an NFS and NetInfo server in Previous itself. The equivalent emulation of the 9p protocol is not yet available, however.
Also note that the most recent version of Plan 9 for NeXT is the second edition (http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/plan9/history/plan9-2e.tar.bz2). Updating the code to use the new graphics system introduced in the 3rd edition is on my to-do list...
Shameless plug - the 9th International Workshop on Plan 9 takes place in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, this April: http://iwp9.org
Btw., NetBSD is also supported in Previous now, but there has been a regression after NetBSD 5.2.3 that we have only been able to identify and fix recently (it seems that there are not a lot of NeXT NetBSD users left...) thanks to the great support by Izumi Tsutsui. So NetBSD 9.3 currently needs a number of patches as discussed on the NetBSD/next68k mailing list (http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-next68k/), but 5.2.3 should work out of the box.
every couple of years I go back to check how's windowmaker/gnustep. Too bad the progress seems to have stalled and the support for some modern features is lacking, I would definitely be open to give it a go again
Does it also emulate the wickedly slow I/O times of the CD/RW drive (er, Canon Magento Optical drive, apparently)? I seem to recall waiting really long for anything to read or write to that thing, despite the wonder of having a CD that I could erase, with 660MB of storage.
Just take a look at the buttons in window title bars - they have box shape with a very distinguishable 3D effect. NeXT design language was evidently borrowed by Windows 95. Which is a good thing, I still miss that level of clarity.
I think that MAME also has a NeXT emulation in it as well. Not sure how far along it is though. Think they had it booting most of the basic demo stuff but I could be confusing it with another bit of hw they had recently got running.
[+] [-] rcarmo|3 years ago|reply
- https://github.com/trunkmaster/nextspace
Alas, the developer is Ukrainian, and hasn’t committed anything in a long while. But maybe someone could help out?
[+] [-] prmoustache|3 years ago|reply
[1] https://github.com/NsCDE/NsCDE
[+] [-] hestefisk|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jim180|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nickhodge|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zanethomas|3 years ago|reply
While Windows 3 was in development I was in the next building working on os/2. (not bragging <g>)
I spent a lot of time in a lab that had a lot of hardware. One day a NeXT machine showed up in the lab.
The next day there was a line of Windows developers waiting for their chance too look at it. (we'll forget the fun I had grabbing a screen shot of the desktop which i then left displayed full screen)
It was a mere matter of days before a build of Windows with 3d buttons came out, and the rest is more history.
[+] [-] homarp|3 years ago|reply
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19084769
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8745943
this forum is where the dev discussion is happening http://www.nextcomputers.org/forums/index.php?topic=2642.0
[+] [-] xigency|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cbmuser|3 years ago|reply
> http://previous.alternative-system.com/
Also, the homepage at unixdude.net is not distributing the sources which is a GPL license violation.
[+] [-] suprjami|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] spitfire|3 years ago|reply
Along with just about all the public ally available software ever made. It’s really a treasure trove.
[+] [-] lockhouse|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] azinman2|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vandahm|3 years ago|reply
https://previous.unixdude.net/about.html
https://previous.unixdude.net/screenshots.html
https://previous.unixdude.net/download.html
https://previous.unixdude.net/version-history.html
[+] [-] fortran77|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] itomato|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] johndoe0815|3 years ago|reply
Also note that the most recent version of Plan 9 for NeXT is the second edition (http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/plan9/history/plan9-2e.tar.bz2). Updating the code to use the new graphics system introduced in the 3rd edition is on my to-do list...
Shameless plug - the 9th International Workshop on Plan 9 takes place in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, this April: http://iwp9.org
Btw., NetBSD is also supported in Previous now, but there has been a regression after NetBSD 5.2.3 that we have only been able to identify and fix recently (it seems that there are not a lot of NeXT NetBSD users left...) thanks to the great support by Izumi Tsutsui. So NetBSD 9.3 currently needs a number of patches as discussed on the NetBSD/next68k mailing list (http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-next68k/), but 5.2.3 should work out of the box.
[+] [-] lol_catz|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nunodonato|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pmarreck|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] TazeTSchnitzel|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pmarreck|3 years ago|reply
other questions: sometimes right-click for context menu requires a click and hold, other times it doesn't. configurable?
[+] [-] b112|3 years ago|reply
Now I am sad.
[+] [-] pjerem|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sgt|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hoc|3 years ago|reply
This has such a calming feeling to it.
[+] [-] eatmyshorts|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] TomMasz|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] johndoe0815|3 years ago|reply
Some more details would help. Which OS are you trying to run Previous on? Did you compile the code yourself or did you use a prebuilt binary?
[+] [-] garganzol|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] guessbest|3 years ago|reply
https://www.theverge.com/2019/11/1/20943552/scroll-bar-visua...
[+] [-] vandahm|3 years ago|reply
I have an old NeXT machine that works and has NeXTstep running on it. How can I extract the ROM from it and use it to run this emulator?
[+] [-] Quequau|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] speed_spread|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gattilorenz|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sumtechguy|3 years ago|reply
I think that MAME also has a NeXT emulation in it as well. Not sure how far along it is though. Think they had it booting most of the basic demo stuff but I could be confusing it with another bit of hw they had recently got running.
[+] [-] soferio|3 years ago|reply
Retrospective partly about NeXt with Steve Jobs.
[+] [-] stevedekorte|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] xattt|3 years ago|reply
Too much looking around the corner to see what you’re typing.
[+] [-] Aldipower|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gjvc|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ixtli|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Smrchy|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] spitfire|3 years ago|reply
Quantrix is also a fat binary so you can run it on x86 nextstep or openstep under in a vm.