(no title)
75dvtwin | 2 years ago
As many as it takes to maintain the US dollar as reserve currency, and necessary access to mineral resources.
What I do not know if NATO was able to change regime in a country, without having it (NATO) being directly involved in a conflict.
In my understanding if NATO was able to change a regime, there were expressly military boots on the ground (or bombing campaigns like in Yugoslavia)
Some of these regimes are horrible to their own people, so the change by NATO (acting an alias term for 'US') is good.
Sort of like the Spanish Conquistadors stopped the horrors of the Aztec empire [1]
[1] https://www.iflscience.com/bizarre-child-sacrifice-confirms-...
No comments yet.