top | item 35269100

(no title)

iramiller | 2 years ago

Well the SEC certainly has one point of view.

Unfortunately the CFTC has another view and they both can’t be right so which part of the federal governance applies here?

https://www.cftc.gov/digitalassets/index.htm

This ambiguity is why clarity is needed. In the famous words of Matt Levine everything is securities fraud.

It seems obvious that some legal clarity is actually required here.

discuss

order

Alex3917|2 years ago

> Unfortunately the CFTC has another view and they both can’t be right

Of course they can. Whether something is a commodity has absolutely nothing to do with whether something is a security. They are completely orthogonal concepts.

HWR_14|2 years ago

Wait, what? I thought a commodity was corn and a security was stock and everything in this discussion was about arguing which it was closer to.

What is a commodity then?

choma1|2 years ago

Why can't they both be right? Futures aren't securities except in certain cases, and if bitcoin is a currency then bitcoin futures wouldn't be under SEC jurisdiction.

peyton|2 years ago

“Commodity” is shorthand for “non-security commodity” in CFTC-speak.