(no title)
rnosov
|
2 years ago
They are instruction tuning it using the dataset released by stanford-alpaca team. The dataset itself is synthetic (created using GPT-3) and somewhat noisy and in my view can be easily recreated if OpenAI ever tries to go after it (which is very unlikely). Anyway, facebook has nothing to do with anything used by this project.
Mizza|2 years ago
hutzlibu|2 years ago
With these things, it is usually the other way around.
If you are a small fish, no one will care. But if you are big enough, that money could be extracted from you, then they will come. A big org just has better lawers and negotiating power, but they really cannot ignore the law. Especially not, if there is a competitor with money to sue.
So if you are small and want to become big, better be cautious on the legal ground you are walking.
rnosov|2 years ago
gremlinsinc|2 years ago
A. it's an output gained via following the letter of the law (TOS).
B. TOS only applies directly to people who've accepted the TOS, unless alpaca's license/TOS ALSO forwards the same criterion as it's source at openai, then derivatives wouldn't apply.
It's like if an app developer on IOS violated a TOS, and apple tried to go after everybody who ever used the app, they didn't agree directly to the TOS, only the developer did.
sebzim4500|2 years ago