These arguments are no different than when governments try to have backdoors installed in technology. They say it's about protecting the kids to make the new laws hard to argue against without looking like a monster, but in reality the laws are tools for them to do more nefarious things. If a politician ever uses "protecting the children" as a justification, that should be a huge alarm bell in your head that means you should really consider what arguments you would have against their suggestion if kids weren't involved.
Nobody was ever trying to show 1st graders sexually explicit material in libraries. This is a tool to suppress ideas about things like LGBTQ.
Why are you defending the bigots in charge of the state that wish to marginalize their fellow man?
TFA contains no examples of children being shown "sexually explicit material" by educators in public employ. I've never heard of it happening in Missouri, and I have lived here for decades. Thread parent has shown no indication of bigotry. You don't seem to be discussing this issue in good faith.
kimbernator|2 years ago
Nobody was ever trying to show 1st graders sexually explicit material in libraries. This is a tool to suppress ideas about things like LGBTQ.
Why are you defending the bigots in charge of the state that wish to marginalize their fellow man?
jessaustin|2 years ago
anigbrowl|2 years ago
[deleted]