"There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation and naming things" - Phil Karlton http://people.famouswhy.com/phil_karlton/ (NB: "hard" things)
While we're being flippant: Every problem in computer science can be solved by adding another level of indirection - except for the problem of too many levels of indirection
I don't think you read the article. It is only saying that there are two things you need to know in jest. If you looked at the article, you'd see that many fields, such as CS, have more than one set of "two things" that you need to know.
The answers in the article are pretty cool, except for the programming ones. Just like in programming, people try to get cute with conciseness and end up making pretty unfunny jokes. Once you have heard the word "idiot" in anything having to do with programming, subsequent mentions are yawners.
But the whole idea of narrowing down everything to two core principles is awesome; so +1 from me, certainly.
Axiom of Choice has been on shaky ground for the past 50 years and really only continues it's existence through inertia. The second one has some deep wisdom in it though :)
The Two Things about Biology:
1. Evolution is the process through which genetic structures that are better equipped to reproduce viable copies will tend to proliferate.
2. Except for the Platypus.
Obviously the premise of "two things" is fairly ridiculous, but I bet it's an interesting thing to ask people at parties. I cannot stand party small talk, and the most fun I've had socialising with strangers were when I ask them straight questions like these.
Another thing I ask people, just out of curiosity since it's not insightful at the same level, is to just go through their average day. Sort of like a bottom-up description of their work/study/whatever live, instead of the top-down answer you get when you ask "so, what do you do".
[+] [-] 6ren|14 years ago|reply
While we're being flippant: Every problem in computer science can be solved by adding another level of indirection - except for the problem of too many levels of indirection
[+] [-] jasonkostempski|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Tichy|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kevinh|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jacques_chester|14 years ago|reply
Boiling complex fields down to flippant levels of brevity helps the summariser to develop deeper understanding. It can also save a lot of time.
See also: "Desert island" lists of books, movies, music, art, software etc.
[+] [-] dsr_|14 years ago|reply
Your product must be something people want.
Your product must be something you can make.
[+] [-] philwelch|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ISeemToBeAVerb|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zdw|14 years ago|reply
1. You will spend too much time here
2. You will discover noprocrast
[+] [-] jpdoctor|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gfodor|14 years ago|reply
- Do it today
- Repeat
[+] [-] gm|14 years ago|reply
But the whole idea of narrowing down everything to two core principles is awesome; so +1 from me, certainly.
[+] [-] gmisra|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dreamyogi|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cgs1019|14 years ago|reply
1. ZF
2. C
or
Set Theory:
1. Everything is a set
2. Not everything is a set
[+] [-] ZephyrP|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Clanan|14 years ago|reply
The Two Things about Biology: 1. Evolution is the process through which genetic structures that are better equipped to reproduce viable copies will tend to proliferate. 2. Except for the Platypus.
[+] [-] morsch|14 years ago|reply
Another thing I ask people, just out of curiosity since it's not insightful at the same level, is to just go through their average day. Sort of like a bottom-up description of their work/study/whatever live, instead of the top-down answer you get when you ask "so, what do you do".
Some people may think it's weird, though.
[+] [-] zeynalov|14 years ago|reply
1. Everybody hates Dentists.
2. Dentists hate everybody.
[+] [-] AznHisoka|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ZephyrP|14 years ago|reply
1. Everything you thought you knew about the fundamental structure of the universe before will only make you ashamed.
2. It's all just vanity
[+] [-] unknown|14 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] pazimzadeh|14 years ago|reply
Instead I would say: 1. Some things can replicate better than others. 2. Things replicate imperfectly, causing change over time.
[+] [-] envane|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] akazackfriedman|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] twopi|14 years ago|reply
1) You are playing The Game 2) You just lost The Game
[+] [-] alanfalcon|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|14 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] discipline|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] twiceaday|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cwe|14 years ago|reply