[thrwawy74]

So this is like... let's introduce these concepts at a certain age level ("think of the kids") to normalize control over a population, eventually expanding it to undesirables? This is dangerous. Just like the groomers thing. The best thing about the internet has been unadulterated, unrestricted access to information. Parents should be more involved with what their kids are seeing, but kids seeing anything (from neopets to al'queda beheadings) are what has created some seriously talented and informed people. We need outliers and deviants, not curfew-ed lambs.

They've had so much success with "groomers" in other states. They're trying to "protect" more young kids now.

[eldritch_4ier]

"Restricting the firehose of content driving mass upticks in childhood suicide rates, obesity, porn usage, and mental health issues - this is dangerous!".

[tiedieconderoga]

Interesting analogy.

Have you ever tried to squeeze a firehose shut without turning off the water first?

[SpaceL10n]

"Restricting the firehose of content driving mass upticks in Atheism - this is dangerous!".