top | item 35383297

(no title)

osobo | 2 years ago

It's not just about life-years. It's about the risk of making significant stretches of land uninhabitable for a serious amount of time. 26 Chernobyl-like releases would have punched some serious holes in the map of the Western world. Furthermore, the 30-year argument sounds disingenuous ("LNT-Worshipping"? Really?) and the CO2 waste issue is mentioned where the nuclear waste issue is not.

Honestly, the whole thing feels like cheap propaganda.

discuss

order

illiarian|2 years ago

First, we'd need to have 26 Chernobyl-level incidents that you assume are a given.

Second, there's very little issue with nuclear waste. Way, way, way less than the media make it out to be

danw1979|2 years ago

Imagine two or three 30km radius circles taken out of the UK and how much that would cost.