top | item 35394565 (no title) KarlKemp | 2 years ago There is absolutely no reason to believe there was another Single user getting this treatment before. The Elon-case was just copy & pasted as an ego-stroking hack. discuss order hn newest philosopher1234|2 years ago i think he means trump, and i think it would've been strategically wise to give trump special treatment (tho probably not ideal) db48x|2 years ago Actually, my first thought was the previous owner, or perhaps Twitter itself. But I left the question open, since it doesn’t matter who. load replies (2) oildynastyb|2 years ago [deleted]
philosopher1234|2 years ago i think he means trump, and i think it would've been strategically wise to give trump special treatment (tho probably not ideal) db48x|2 years ago Actually, my first thought was the previous owner, or perhaps Twitter itself. But I left the question open, since it doesn’t matter who. load replies (2) oildynastyb|2 years ago [deleted]
db48x|2 years ago Actually, my first thought was the previous owner, or perhaps Twitter itself. But I left the question open, since it doesn’t matter who. load replies (2)
philosopher1234|2 years ago
db48x|2 years ago
oildynastyb|2 years ago
[deleted]