Yes, they let go 130 employees a couple of months ago. They're also a company whose remote pay is dependent on location. So they're unwilling to pay people what they're actually worth.
There are some concrete examples here, but it really feels like most of the opportunities are around software as that's still the lowest-barrier, training-time-efficient, highest paying job you can learn remotely. That's by far the easiest way to reach their 1:100 investment/income ratio.
I'm very skeptical of their "North Star". They want the "lifetime earnings" of individuals to increase by 100x their investment. Isn't it extremely difficult to even measure this metric? That is something that would take decades to measure. You can't just extrapolate on temporary increases because people lose/change jobs regularly.
They don't define anywhere in their handbook how they're actually going to measure this AFAICT.
The handbook which is linked is both irritating to navigate, and seemingly anemic. There are, however, hints as to their specific future funding activities, which include Offline Freecodecamp and Last Mile, with hints in the Activities section that lead me to deduce that the activities will be in the communities where Last Mile and the like work. Which is admirable. The results-focused aspect is different to any I've come across before, and I'll be interested to see if there's any future update on how they actually do.
I wonder what the research shows behind increasing peoples profits vs decreasing cost of living vs affecting non-financial changes on peoples quality of life and happiness.
Massive over simplification but surely if everyone keeps trying to earn more money - that money has to come from somewhere, inflation happens and we're at where we are now all over again. The game is rigged.
> Massive over simplification but surely if everyone keeps trying to earn more money - that money has to come from somewhere, inflation happens and we're at where we are now all over again. The game is rigged.
Humans do not all learn at the same rate. We will not be "where we are now all over again", as many people will be much smarter and more experienced.
Same here, I have so many questions, are they gonna provide tutorials on how to make money, is it in any way related to Gitlab as a product, is it about directly giving away money, I mean it could be a pyramid scheme for all we know...
[+] [-] rcme|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sosodev|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] TheCoelacanth|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] geodel|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] apple4ever|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] phailhaus|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] HopenHeyHi|3 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] kayson|3 years ago|reply
> grow their lifetime earnings through education, training, access to opportunities, and systems change on a global scale
What is their actual plan? What opportunities? What systems?
I hope they make a positive impact but so far it just seems like marketing hype.
[+] [-] vsareto|3 years ago|reply
https://gitlabfoundation.notion.site/Activities-47c282c91b54...
https://gitlabfoundation.notion.site/Intervention-Points-50f...
[+] [-] sosodev|3 years ago|reply
They don't define anywhere in their handbook how they're actually going to measure this AFAICT.
[+] [-] thomasjb|3 years ago|reply
[+] [-] smcleod|3 years ago|reply
Massive over simplification but surely if everyone keeps trying to earn more money - that money has to come from somewhere, inflation happens and we're at where we are now all over again. The game is rigged.
[+] [-] sneak|3 years ago|reply
Humans do not all learn at the same rate. We will not be "where we are now all over again", as many people will be much smarter and more experienced.
[+] [-] stcroixx|3 years ago|reply
What does any of it have to do with hosting repos? Please, just do the one thing.
[+] [-] metaphor|3 years ago|reply
[1] https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1653482/000162828023...
[+] [-] antipaul|3 years ago|reply
I'm very confused what this actually is
ELI5, anyone?
[+] [-] rpigab|3 years ago|reply