top | item 35449646 (no title) mackatap | 2 years ago I completely agree. It feels very dirty. You take away the source of income for the creators to earn an extra dollar for yourself. discuss order hn newest mherrmann|2 years ago s/to earn an extra dollar for yourself/to fund your project, in a privacy-preserving way, to make the internet a better place/. madjam002|2 years ago So it’s okay to take away the creators income and replace it with your own just because your project “makes the internet a better place” whatever that subjective tagline means?The criticism is well deserved imo. It’s a sleazy move from Brave. load replies (1) TylerE|2 years ago How many impressions would you need to cover even a $20 monthly hosting bill, never mind feed yourself or pay rent? load replies (1)
mherrmann|2 years ago s/to earn an extra dollar for yourself/to fund your project, in a privacy-preserving way, to make the internet a better place/. madjam002|2 years ago So it’s okay to take away the creators income and replace it with your own just because your project “makes the internet a better place” whatever that subjective tagline means?The criticism is well deserved imo. It’s a sleazy move from Brave. load replies (1) TylerE|2 years ago How many impressions would you need to cover even a $20 monthly hosting bill, never mind feed yourself or pay rent? load replies (1)
madjam002|2 years ago So it’s okay to take away the creators income and replace it with your own just because your project “makes the internet a better place” whatever that subjective tagline means?The criticism is well deserved imo. It’s a sleazy move from Brave. load replies (1)
TylerE|2 years ago How many impressions would you need to cover even a $20 monthly hosting bill, never mind feed yourself or pay rent? load replies (1)
mherrmann|2 years ago
madjam002|2 years ago
The criticism is well deserved imo. It’s a sleazy move from Brave.
TylerE|2 years ago