(no title)
tomandrews88 | 2 years ago
TLDR: there are far fewer consequences for crime now in large cities like SF, NY, LA. The results are as expected.
tomandrews88 | 2 years ago
TLDR: there are far fewer consequences for crime now in large cities like SF, NY, LA. The results are as expected.
fogzen|2 years ago
“While the violent crime rate has fluctuated year-over-year, it has remained relatively stable this past decade—between 428 and 466, hovering near its 2010 level (440), when California embarked on major criminal justice reforms.”
“While violent and property crime rates increased in 2021, both remain relatively low”
https://www.ppic.org/publication/crime-trends-in-california/
tomandrews88|2 years ago
tomandrews88|2 years ago
gwd|2 years ago
revelio|2 years ago
Due to the absolute dominance of voters with this mentality, and the practice of electing prosecutorial positions that in other parts of the world would be professional appointees, they have repeatedly ended up with prosecutors that ran on a campaign of refusing to prosecute. This isn't specific to SF, it can also be seen in LA and New York. In fact one of the criticisms levelled at the Trump inditement is that the prosecutor in question campaigned specifically on prosecuting Trump (for whatever) and has now upgraded what would normally be a misdemeanor, whilst simultaneously downgrading many other types of crime.
In other words: politics, ideology, the usual suspects.