not necessarily. It just means it's not as bad as it would be in China or Russia.
NPR knew the democrats would be back in power in a couple of years...they weren't risking much by being anti-Trump. But they did gain goodwill from the democrats, which can extend them support every time they are in power.
I am not arguing for or against either side, I am just pointing out a flaw in your logic.
I think NPR is so solidly on the democrats side, that it's hard to distinguish what came first: the chicken or the egg?
kube-system|2 years ago
ashwagary|2 years ago
'Trump proposes eliminating federal funding for PBS, NPR' https://thehill.com/homenews/media/373434-trump-proposes-eli...
DrThunder|2 years ago
flavius29663|2 years ago
NPR knew the democrats would be back in power in a couple of years...they weren't risking much by being anti-Trump. But they did gain goodwill from the democrats, which can extend them support every time they are in power.
I am not arguing for or against either side, I am just pointing out a flaw in your logic.
I think NPR is so solidly on the democrats side, that it's hard to distinguish what came first: the chicken or the egg?
davorak|2 years ago
I do not see a flaw in their logic:
> NPR continuing to publish programming critical of Trump during the Trump presidency, is a pretty strong indication they have editorial independence.
That is a strong indicator. An indicator that may not convince everyone by itself, but I do not see any flaw in their logic.