(no title)
j4pe
|
2 years ago
Joe Eskenazi, the author of this piece, is a solid journalist who helps run the tiny donation-funded Mission Local. They've done incredible reporting on corruption in the SF city government and punch
way above their weight in the stories they break. I have respect for how Joe refused to join in reporting this murder as evidence of a violent crime epidemic, while still reporting on homelessness and property crime.
Pils|2 years ago
Mission Local seems to serve their local bureaucratic masters over the basic public safety needs of the people. [0]
This is gaslighting. You should be ashamed. [1]
In this case they are “independent” of a sort [2]
In all fairness, he did retweet this article a couple hours ago.
[0] https://twitter.com/garrytan/status/1644520924828540929?s=20
[1] https://twitter.com/garrytan/status/1644510807060021249?s=20
[2] https://twitter.com/garrytan/status/1644535178856124418?s=20
yonran|2 years ago
Eskenazi is a well-connected journalist, but he is also arrogant and often presents only one side of issues. For example, virtually nothing that he wrote in this article (anonymously sourced from disgruntled politicians) about the magnet school Lowell High school ended up being true (magnet schools do not violate state code as claimed, and the school did return to test-based admission which he claimed would not happen) https://missionlocal.org/2022/02/lowells-old-merit-based-adm.... So while his reporting is mostly good, you have to be aware of his bias.
rideontime|2 years ago
toss1|2 years ago
Yes, street crime is itself a taking of rights and freedom of the people living and working in a place, and it is more important to contain it than to maximize the criminals' rights.
But this shows that the reputation of the tech industry is pretty much underwater, and premature postings like that don't help.
ipqk|2 years ago
kaycebasques|2 years ago
[1] https://grammarist.com/idiom/get-the-scoop/
bombcar|2 years ago
JieJie|2 years ago
asdfman123|2 years ago
Lots of little papers like this seem healthy and then unceremoniously go out of business because they don't make enough money in ad revenue to pay their journalists like 45k/yr. That's not a typo: that's how much Bay Area reporters make.
Support local journalism!
jeffbee|2 years ago
shuckles|2 years ago
biomcgary|2 years ago
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]
okdood64|2 years ago
jkestner|2 years ago
pentagrama|2 years ago
microtherion|2 years ago
Beyond that, it's nor clear to me that revealing the actual name or other personal details of the suspect serves a legitimate purpose of advancing justice or society; however, it is not out of keeping with journalistic practice in other criminal cases in California. Suspects' names get printed in newspapers for far lower profile crimes all the time.
sowbug|2 years ago
aeternum|2 years ago
The police arresting people in secret has historically been .. problematic at best.
anigbrowl|2 years ago
hindsightbias|2 years ago
doctoboggan|2 years ago
napierzaza|2 years ago
[deleted]
hker999|2 years ago
mkehrt|2 years ago
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]
throwaway894345|2 years ago
not2b|2 years ago
Jumping to the conclusion that some homeless guy or street thug did it, without any evidence, is also something that people with axes to grind do on a regular basis.
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]
johnea|2 years ago
timbob53|2 years ago
[deleted]
lazyasciiart|2 years ago
kcplate|2 years ago
[deleted]
roundandround|2 years ago
Wow, more evidence that this is a city in the US?
say_it_as_it_is|2 years ago
dang|2 years ago
phendrenad2|2 years ago
Aloisius|2 years ago
etc-hosts|2 years ago
If it's all made up, that would be amazing. Doubtful.