top | item 35572785

(no title)

9999px | 2 years ago

[flagged]

discuss

order

spdustin|2 years ago

Please don’t do this. Your comment history has quite a few violations of the guidelines[0].

     Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents. Omit internet tropes.
[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

9999px|2 years ago

Thanks. I could've been more verbose, but my point was/is correct.

chillbill|2 years ago

> please don’t do this

Do what exactly? And explain the basis of your accusation

ESTheComposer|2 years ago

Yeah I'm not one of those "COVID is less deadly than the flu!1!1!" people or anything, but the reporting is so terrible for COVID that these numbers are very probably vastly over estimated (some European countries and some US states) and vastly under reported at the same time (China).

On the over estimated part, many many deaths are reported as COVID related even if COVID had nothing to do with their death or other factors caused their death.

guilhas|2 years ago

Died of any cause up to 60 days of a overly sensitive PCR test, that even it's creator said it can be very easily misused. We could only wish vaccine deaths were counted the same way

Slightly worse than the flu. But definetly over counted in developed nations, and overestimated in developing nations

s9w|2 years ago

[deleted]

ihatepython|2 years ago

On the bright side, flu numbers were pretty much nonexistent during the pandemic

dmonitor|2 years ago

I keep seeing this, but I have a hard time believing Covid is so much more contagious than the flu that it managed to spread like wildfire while the flu ceased to exist in the same timeframe. The entire narrative was that the US was terrible at mitigating the spread of Covid, but if the US was able to mitigate the flu with above and beyond success in that same time period, what anti-flu measures were taken that didn’t effect Covid?