top | item 35573401

(no title)

PpEY4fu85hkQpn | 2 years ago

I was hoping to read more about the dispute you were talking about.

As far as I can tell the dispute is that twitter didn't pay the rent and the building owner wants them to pay the rent, which is how this has been reported.

discuss

order

Izkata|2 years ago

Page 3, in the middle of them laying out the timeline:

  9  14. On or about November 22, 2022, Plaintiff served Defendant with a demand to
  10 increase the LOC by $10,000,000 pursuant to Paragraphs 13 and 25 of the Lease. A true
  11 and correct copy of such demand is attached hereto as Exhibit 2 and incorporated herein by
  12 this reference. Defendant did not, within the time specified in the notice, or at any other
  13 time thereafter, increase the LOC by $10,000,000.  Rather, Defendant contended, in
  14 response to Plaintiff’s notice, that it was not required to increase the LOC by $10,000,000
  15 upon a transfer in control of Defendant under the terms of the Lease.

ImPostingOnHN|2 years ago

thus, not only is elmu not paying rent, he's not paying for this LOC increase either

still unclear why elmu thinks he shouldn't have to pay rent