top | item 35607250

(no title)

wisnoskij | 2 years ago

I think the problem is that it will likely be viewed as less destructive and used in cases where they would not have does a pit maneuver.

Like a taser, in theory it is great to have a LESS lethal option than a gun, but if it is used in cases where they never would have used a gun, you might argue it was a net loss. Arguably, police should probably not use a taser if they do not feel threatened. But on the flipside if they feel threatened, they absolutely should be shooting them with real bullets, so the taser certainty has cost police officers their lives when they thought it would be a good enough deterrent and it turned out not to be.

Also, you can only have so much gear.

discuss

order

No comments yet.