top | item 35623897 (no title) tribby | 2 years ago I agree. for some reason I don’t think they’d use this language reporting on amazon… discuss order hn newest ShamelessC|2 years ago So you’re implying they _would_ use harsher language against Amazon, thus maintaining their claims of editorial independence from mutual owner Bezos?Not to suggest the Washington Post doesn’t have clear conflicts of interest. Just not sure how your comment adds up. Incipient|2 years ago I'm not sure why any company, as large as these, gives two hoots about stories like these. Published one day for clicks, forgotten the next. Absolutely zero reputation damage. unknown|2 years ago [deleted]
ShamelessC|2 years ago So you’re implying they _would_ use harsher language against Amazon, thus maintaining their claims of editorial independence from mutual owner Bezos?Not to suggest the Washington Post doesn’t have clear conflicts of interest. Just not sure how your comment adds up. Incipient|2 years ago I'm not sure why any company, as large as these, gives two hoots about stories like these. Published one day for clicks, forgotten the next. Absolutely zero reputation damage.
Incipient|2 years ago I'm not sure why any company, as large as these, gives two hoots about stories like these. Published one day for clicks, forgotten the next. Absolutely zero reputation damage.
ShamelessC|2 years ago
Not to suggest the Washington Post doesn’t have clear conflicts of interest. Just not sure how your comment adds up.
Incipient|2 years ago
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]