top | item 35624998

(no title)

AstixAndBelix | 2 years ago

For some reason most online publications still think we're in the era of paper journals and stubbornly refuse to corredate their articles with references as if they had strict space constraints

discuss

order

Someone|2 years ago

No, they think they’re in the 21st century and think it brings in more money when site visitors click on links that stay on their site than when they click on outgoing links.

The publication is open access and has images. See https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00407-022-00302-w

yesco|2 years ago

> it brings in more money when site visitors click on links that stay on their site than when they click on outgoing links

As trust in journalism declines, I wonder if/when we will start to see a reversal of this?

Providing sources, and bragging about providing sources when other news orgs do not, seems like it would be a great selling point to a lot of people. At the same time, I would also bet that the vast majority of people would never check/click the sources if provided, especially if structured like a bibliography and pushed off to the side. Just the comfort of believing the sources are available would be enough to keep people coming back, meaning journalists would get to have their cake and eat it too.

eru|2 years ago

I'm mildly impressed that this Springer site let me just view the article and its pdf without jumping through any hoops.

I usually recoil whenever I find myself on a Springer site and their paywalls.

spacebanana7|2 years ago

Google could solve this problem.

A new ranking boost for high reputation outbound links similar to the current boost for high reputation inbound links would encourage citations because editors would encourage the practice from journalists.

Some check might be necessary to make sure the citation fits the context of the article, however current NLP tech can manage that fairly well - and again I vaguely remember that Google has a some kind context check for outbound links too.

Eric_WVGG|2 years ago

That’s already how Google works.

The publishers either aren’t aware of that, or think captive readers are more valuable than SEO.