It doesn't make sense because the barrier to "apphood" in whatever Chrome defines to be an app is scarcely more than making a manifest. The distinction between a chrome app and a webpage is very minimal. What user problem is being solved by this? Why do I need a screenshot of the "app" (i.e. webpage) I am already using?
dahwolf|2 years ago
It can be minimal, it can be significant difference, all depends on the PWA implementation.
Installed app has a shortcut/desktop icon, which is good for return engagement. A flash screen ratehr than the blunt loading of a web page. The UI can be instantly there as well as some content using offline tactics. A PWA isn't compromised by all kinds of browser real estate.
A proper PWA can definitely be better or approach a proper desktop app, but it's true that few implement them in that rich way.
pjmlp|2 years ago
Secondly, not having Electron all over the place.
cxr|2 years ago
LuciusChen|2 years ago
vbezhenar|2 years ago
This is one of the primary reasons why many developers still prefer to publish in App Stores, despite the various obstacles and risks involved.
Mobile Safari also treats websites differently if users add them to their home screen. It doesn't aggressively remove local storage in these cases. However, I am not certain about Chrome's behavior in this regard.
cxr|2 years ago
When the person you are responding to writes, "What user problem is being solved by this?" they are not being asked to have the value proposition of "installable" Web apps explained to them. They are asking about exactly what they say they are: "Why do I need a screenshot of the "app" (i.e. webpage) I am already using?"
sparsely|2 years ago