One of HNs failure-modes is inaccuracies get voted to the top if they seem correct to the majority of voters whose biases resonate with poster's.
Aside: thank you for asking. When I previously encountered incorrect top-level comments that I knew to be wrong (insider information), I'd simply ignore and move on. You've inspired me to push back more often.
But not always! There are those among us who like nothing better than to double down in a flame war. One nice thing about having visited often over the past 7 years is that I know whom to avoid responding to (for the most part).
If you've worked at a large organization, you'll know the news can paint a cartoonishly distorted picture largely informed by the perspective of the anonymous sources, journalist and news organization.
Good managers insulate reports from the politics, if you weren’t plugged into it it’s either your manager did a good job or it’s the only part of Google that isn’t 90% politics.
Signed, “didn’t work at brain or dm but was involved in a lot of alphabet level decision making”.
I never like the word “politics.” It carries the association of a bunch of people just playing backstabbing games to further themselves.
While this does occur, in general what I see is that with any large-enough group of people, there will be strong differences of opinions on how to steer the project to success.
In fact, I don’t think I can remember a single “political battle” that didn’t stem from a legitimate concern in how some project was being run and what they had decided to focus on.
sangnoir|2 years ago
Aside: thank you for asking. When I previously encountered incorrect top-level comments that I knew to be wrong (insider information), I'd simply ignore and move on. You've inspired me to push back more often.
hazn|2 years ago
bookofjoe|2 years ago
return_to_monke|2 years ago
caminante|2 years ago
[0] https://techcrunch.com/2023/04/20/google-consolidates-ai-res...
[1]https://www.wsj.com/articles/google-unit-deepmind-triedand-f...
sangnoir|2 years ago
f5e4|2 years ago
> Demis now has a load of people reporting to him who previously were rooting for his failure
nr2x|2 years ago
Signed, “didn’t work at brain or dm but was involved in a lot of alphabet level decision making”.
uptownfunk|2 years ago
khazhoux|2 years ago
While this does occur, in general what I see is that with any large-enough group of people, there will be strong differences of opinions on how to steer the project to success.
In fact, I don’t think I can remember a single “political battle” that didn’t stem from a legitimate concern in how some project was being run and what they had decided to focus on.