(no title)
robert-graham | 2 years ago
I say this from personal experience. I created many inventions in "intrusion detection", spent years in data centers making theory work in practice. SRI sued me using vaguely worded patents.
It's a harsh accusation, but objectively true. They never built a commercial intrusion-detection product, but they did sue people.
mlyle|2 years ago
> They never built a commercial intrusion-detection product
No, but they did give away things like Bothunter away (which is admittedly HIDS).
I'm sympathetic to the argument against patents, etc. I was your competitor in the IDS space and also made a very fast IDS and exited, and also was harassed by people without a product in the market (over sending TCP RSTs to close connections, of all things, where there was loads of prior art).
AlbertCory|2 years ago
Wow, do the lawyers over on Reddit hate this! In the Appendix, you can follow the progress of a recent Facebook patent:
https://albertcory50.substack.com/p/lets-vote-on-it
I do tend to be inflammatory at times /s
AlbertCory|2 years ago
SRI is a real research entity. I know someone who worked there, and he's not a lawyer. That doesn't make them any more admirable, of course.