He turned around an almost dying windows to become this Kraken that has the majority dev environment in its chokehold. That's impressive
Other candidates in my list are Frank Slootman of Snowflake and Tim Cook of Apple for how he has not dropped the ball from Steve Jobs. What are yours?
suby|2 years ago
Some examples that I've seen posted to HN over the past few months
* Microsoft Edge leaks browser history to Bing - https://www.theverge.com/2023/4/25/23697532/microsoft-edge-b...
* More ads in Windows 11 start menu - https://www.theregister.com/2023/04/17/microsoft_windows_sta...
* Absolute junk shoved into the Windows UI - https://thomasbandt.com/the-day-windows-died? https://birchtree.me/blog/the-windows-11-trash-party/ https://www.tomshardware.com/news/windows-keeps-feeding-tabl...
Windows is in a boiling frog situation. It's been slowly accumulating dark patterns and anti-features like mandatory online-only accounts, while at the same time losing quality of life features like the ability to move your taskbar or to not combine apps in the taskbar.
I should be using Windows today. I grew up on Windows, I learned to program on Windows, I had a very difficult and bumpy transition in getting off of Windows. But I had to leave their ecosystem because they have absolutely no respect for the user, and at this point I do not trust them. I want to reiterate that these are recent things, I'm not mad at them for what they did in the 90's here.
They aren't treating Windows as a serious tool for getting shit done, they're treating it as a data-mine and advertising opportunity.
pchangr|2 years ago
michelb|2 years ago
felixg3|2 years ago
If you care about privacy, there is only one option, and that’s Desktop Linux, albeit less than ideal in many use cases.
uberman|2 years ago
MS still lacks a industry leading 21st century consumer device and Nadella has not been able to change that but his bets on cloud computing, embracing of Linux and open source and the rise of VSCode are something to behold.
As an "older-school" dev, I am constantly amazed that I can open a linux prompt on windows or do VSCode work with a local gui on a remote computer or inside a docker container.
colanderman|2 years ago
Similarly, I'm amazed that I can build truly cross-platform .NET apps using Microsoft's own open-source tools from the Linux command line. (Apparently .NET Core, which both adopted the MIT license, and ushered in true cross-platform support, was announced later in the year that Nadella took over. [1] Not sure whether he had anything to do with it.)
What an about-face from 2000-era Microsoft's embrace-extend-extinguish approach. Remember Visual J++? If you'd told me then I'd be willingly programming on a Microsoft toolchain 20 years later I would not have believed you.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET#History
flatiron|2 years ago
zamnos|2 years ago
The XBox division doesn't count?
voisin|2 years ago
Is this a prerequisite to being a great technology company today? Or is this just one vector that some competitors choose to compete on? For example, would we say Apple isn’t a great technology company because it doesn’t have an industry leasing office suite like MS and Google?
zamnos|2 years ago
And then Microsoft bought Github.
bm-rf|2 years ago
phkahler|2 years ago
Oh but they have brought 21st century advertising and bullshit to windows devices!
ASalazarMX|2 years ago
steve1977|2 years ago
I assume this means "older-school Windows dev", as none of that is new in the UNIX world.
qbasic_forever|2 years ago
A lot of this damage was done under Balmer, but IMHO Nadella has a lot of blame too. Microsoft has gone from domination of computing platforms and making money on every single device sale to competing for scraps in someone else's app store (making that someone else money!) as they sell office apps and such ported to platforms they don't control anymore.
I think there isn't more outrage or unrest about this failure from Microsoft shareholders since Azure and other service growth has kept dollars flowing in and the share price up. But Microsoft is nowhere near their 90s peak of total control over consumer computing.
voisin|2 years ago
Lost on mobile hardware and OS but their software (office, outlook, OneDrive) is extremely popular on mobile, no?
thefz|2 years ago
Dude. There are gonna still be servers, network infra, etc.
goolz|2 years ago
linguae|2 years ago
duped|2 years ago
barelyauser|2 years ago
1letterunixname|2 years ago
jansan|2 years ago
thefz|2 years ago
gentleman11|2 years ago
In my mind, he’s the worst ceo of the last decade
midoridensha|2 years ago
If you don't like the product, you're free to not buy it, and use something else. There are many alternatives.
tomstockmail|2 years ago
endisneigh|2 years ago
CivBase|2 years ago
I consider MS's record under Nadella to be a mixed bag. Azure is probably Nadella's biggest success, but it's hard to come up with any other significant market in which MS has excelled under Nadella where they were not previously dominant.
From a user perspective, many MS products I use have improved and many have changed in ways I would consider to be detrimental. VS Code is probably the only new MS product that I've started using regularly - and I'd only consider it to be a minor improvement over Sublime Text for my use cases.
Teslazar|2 years ago
AzzieElbab|2 years ago
bruce511|2 years ago
So let me summarise - clearly not, because they don't make a consumer/device (aka phone). Only phone companies can have a best CEO. Then again Apple doesn't have a successful cloud platform, Google doesn't make cars, Amazon's rockets aren't very useful, SpaceX doesn't make a phone, Tesla -is- a phone (the best "mobile" phone ever?). What about social media, ad-platform, AI?
Clearly deciding it based on product is absurd.
Equally we could debate the merits of owning an OS, or an Office platform, or a streaming service.
We could base it on innovation, stock price and growth, market cap, employee numbers, cash in the bank, acquisitions, willingness to kill projects, ability to smoke weed. We could define it as having laid off no-one ever.
All of which is to say, there's no "best" to begin with. There are thousands of companies,of every scale, which have done well by some metric, which have survived rocky roads, which have provided value to society, to customers, to employees.
My hat is off to all if them. Their success keeps food on the table, and roofs over heads.
Asking which is best, without define criteria is hopeless because clearly all companies have strengths and weaknesses. We might as well puck which sport is "best". (Where the right answer is golf because, um, that's what I like. And because more 80+ year-olds do golf than everything else combined. They're experienced enough to know.)
drcongo|2 years ago
blindriver|2 years ago
easytiger|2 years ago
tdsanchez|2 years ago
Windows 11 is a laughing stock to many and it isn't exactly flying off the shelves.
Microsoft is a hot mess and Nadella is a trader the same way Pichai is at Google.
Same for Tim Cook.
Look back at news articles for the past year and watch how fast Nadella pivoted from "the metaverse" to GPT.
Stock buybacks make CEOs look impressive if you don't know about stock buybacks.
https://money.usnews.com/investing/articles/s-p-500-stocks-w...
toast0|2 years ago
They are, they had flat UI and dark mode years before anyone else. I imagine iOS and Android will get live tiles one of these days, too.
osigurdson|2 years ago
endisneigh|2 years ago
pell|2 years ago
Microsoft was still growing under Ballmer. Windows was far away from “dying”.
AndrewKemendo|2 years ago
Then you can sample across CEOs and then measure Nadella based on that
Do you have such criteria and data?
raincom|2 years ago
brodouevencode|2 years ago
throw47463|2 years ago
She made it relevant again.
ipaddr|2 years ago
blueflow|2 years ago
Is that so?
mnd999|2 years ago
tomnipotent|2 years ago
https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2022/#most-popular-technolog...
irrational|2 years ago
reportgunner|2 years ago
LadyCailin|2 years ago
bobleeswagger|2 years ago
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]
DueDilligence|2 years ago
[deleted]
dev_0|2 years ago
[deleted]
meerita|2 years ago
[deleted]
quadrifoliate|2 years ago
It is in the long-term interests of HN to not have this place be riddled with bland autogenerated comments.
kweingar|2 years ago
I’m glad that Dan has clarified that HN comments are not allowed to be copy/pasted LLM outputs, or we’d end up with a lot more non-comments like this.
kastden|2 years ago
gopuck16|2 years ago
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]
1letterunixname|2 years ago