top | item 35752845

Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund is fighting for the future of open source software

59 points| anaoum | 2 years ago |techcrunch.com | reply

48 comments

order
[+] djschnei|2 years ago|reply
Craig Wright is such a gigantic tool. Anyone that puts an ounce of weight behind a single word of his is an even bigger tool. Sue me.
[+] KirillPanov|2 years ago|reply
Indeed; this whole situation is the Jerry Springer show of open source.
[+] thesausageking|2 years ago|reply
Craig Wright, the guy who brought this lawsuit, has been suing people left and right for years.

He lost a high profile case last year against a podcaster who called him a fraud. The judge ruled against Wright and found that he had "advanced a deliberately false case and put forward deliberately false evidence until days before trial".

[+] barnbuilder|2 years ago|reply
> He lost

Sadly this is not true. Wright was ruled to have won the case but had the damage award reduced to only 1 pound.[1] (Wright is being bankrolled by billionaire Calvin Ayre. They are not worried about the money here.)

How someone can win a case while found to have "advanced a deliberately false case and put forward deliberately false evidence until days before trial" just goes to show how utterly deranged the British legal system is. As long as it is such, scammers like Craig Wright and Calvin Ayre will continue to torment innocent people.

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/aug/01/craig-wri...

[+] nullc|2 years ago|reply
But here is what winning means for his target: In addition to years of his life tied up in this, "Craig Wright has just submitted a bill of costs for £3.379m for his costs of my dropped defences and a two day hearing in February 2021. Defences I dropped due to excess cost My whole budge to trial was £1.3m." ( https://twitter.com/PeterMcCormack/status/165230790417358029... )

Obviously he's fighting the costs, which are due to earlier phases of the proceedings where McCormack tried to get the case summarily dismissed and was unsuccessful, resulting in Mr. Wright being awarded costs.

[+] rwmj|2 years ago|reply
A user on HN is one of those affected. He posted a very detailed story about his awful experience: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34685029
[+] PretzelPirate|2 years ago|reply
That's not just a HM user, that's Gregory Maxwell who was the main Bitcoin developer after Gavin Andresen left.

Maxwell has is own history of drama, but I can certainly agree with him that Craig Wright sucks.

[+] nadermx|2 years ago|reply
So I am confused, if I claim some one hacked me, I basically can forum shop, and state outlandish accusations, because "I got hacked"?
[+] trompetenaccoun|2 years ago|reply
Basically yes in this case, the guy has made a career out of our broken legal system.
[+] smoldesu|2 years ago|reply
Ideally you wouldn't use it as an excuse to seize millions of USD worth of assets you don't own, but that's the gist of it yes.
[+] sowbug|2 years ago|reply
TL;DR: yes, but if outlandishness crosses over to deceit, you risk penalties.

Anyone can file a lawsuit if they pay the filing fees.

If they hire a lawyer, the lawyer must uphold the ethical standards of the bar, which carry suspension/disbarment penalties. Those standards generally include a good-faith belief in the legal merits of your client's case, adherence to all laws and court procedures, speaking up when you believe a law is about to be broken, etc.

The client (you) will eventually be called as a witness, and you can go to jail if you lie on the stand or otherwise present false evidence. Unfortunately, the penalties seem to happen a lot less often than the perjury. That's partly because perjury is a criminal offense, carrying a higher burden of proof than a civil claim.

[+] cyanydeez|2 years ago|reply
Is this like when pedophiles claim they're part of the LGBTQ+ community?
[+] nullc|2 years ago|reply
Could you elaborate on your position?