Can we have a line on the HN guidelines saying "telling people you asked about <topic> on ChatGPT doesn't make for interesting discussion. Please refrain from doing so."
Especially in this case where you don't even tell what did you find out, only that you did ask ChatGPT. Good for you.
As opposed to? Unless you're actually going to read individual papers, vet the authors, have the baseline statistical knowledge to understand the results, etc, you're always going to be susceptible to potential misinformation. This HN topic is a good example of the difficulty of verifying information.
Who's to say that ChatGPT doesn't provide a better job of filtering it out?
sph|2 years ago
Especially in this case where you don't even tell what did you find out, only that you did ask ChatGPT. Good for you.
nkotov|2 years ago
nequo|2 years ago
ethbr0|2 years ago
Because I enjoy reading HN?
insanitybit|2 years ago
Who's to say that ChatGPT doesn't provide a better job of filtering it out?