I'm intending to say the opposite. My point is exactly that a government-run bank affords citizens this constitution-protected privacy because the bank would explicitly be a government entity.
(Unless you're asking whether the protections are useless against corporations. Then yes, they're useless.)
lcnPylGDnU4H9OF|2 years ago
(Unless you're asking whether the protections are useless against corporations. Then yes, they're useless.)