Love the look and feel. It's the perfect mix of clean and chaotic.
As someone that works at a link-in-bio company, I find the way you've approached this far more creative.
In a mobile-first world I couldn't find a way to edit anything on the page on my iPhone.
The idea might be nice but without any mobile support (where a huge portion of the world is) it's impossible to tell whether it's good or not as we can't try it.
//edit okay it does work on mobile after reading other comments. Though the link on HN is wrong as I'm writing this: it points to a non-editable page.
Unfortunate compromise of not paying for font licenses — and google fonts is the most extensive collection of free fonts.
As for fonts — it’s unideal! Those initial fonts are actually just the glyphs subset of fonts so I can display their names in the font picker. It’s already somewhat cut down by separating the fonts into basic and all, as well as delaying the load a few seconds after initial load, but still a lot to fix up there.
You absolutely lost me personally with "raises 2.5 million in capital"
History tells me to never trust anything this well funded for something likely to be so personal. Perhaps theres a business case and good luck, but I'll be avoiding.
My world started with LaTeX so I'll support an editor with the audacious goal of making editing "fun". Wasn't aware of mmm, but it looks and "feels" great.
PS:
I am still in love with LaTeX--one of the only strongly-typed editors still standing the test of time.
As someone pursuing my own vision of a hypercard-like multimedia environment that lives in a self-contained HTML document, I'm quite interested in learning about the approach mmm.page takes with interactivity, but attempting to add "custom code" just tells me I need to upgrade. Is there somewhere with more details?
It could do with a heavy perf pass tbh. Haven’t had time juggling all the feature work, but it’s planned for 1.0. Mind letting me know what machine you’re on?
[+] [-] xhfloz|2 years ago|reply
Also: a StumbleUpon-like explore experience of pages created using mmm.page [3].
[1] https://twitter.com/xhfloz/status/1653740562648821760?s=46
[2] https://twitter.com/xhfloz/status/1631746024120221698?s=46
[3] https://explore.mmm.page
[+] [-] waboremo|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] navs|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] yawnxyz|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] armitron|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] can16358p|2 years ago|reply
The idea might be nice but without any mobile support (where a huge portion of the world is) it's impossible to tell whether it's good or not as we can't try it.
//edit okay it does work on mobile after reading other comments. Though the link on HN is wrong as I'm writing this: it points to a non-editable page.
[+] [-] mza|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rpgbr|2 years ago|reply
Also, why does mmm.page loads ~160 Google web fonts?
[+] [-] xhfloz|2 years ago|reply
As for fonts — it’s unideal! Those initial fonts are actually just the glyphs subset of fonts so I can display their names in the font picker. It’s already somewhat cut down by separating the fonts into basic and all, as well as delaying the load a few seconds after initial load, but still a lot to fix up there.
[+] [-] justin_oaks|2 years ago|reply
Using a WYSIWYG editor is really useful for people who want to create content, not create an app.
[+] [-] ReadEvalPost|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jrm4|2 years ago|reply
History tells me to never trust anything this well funded for something likely to be so personal. Perhaps theres a business case and good luck, but I'll be avoiding.
[+] [-] shove|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] akhayam|2 years ago|reply
PS: I am still in love with LaTeX--one of the only strongly-typed editors still standing the test of time.
[+] [-] RodgerTheGreat|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|2 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] twic|2 years ago|reply
So how do you do that? I'm probably missing something very obvious here.
[+] [-] xhfloz|2 years ago|reply
(But due to some iFrame hackiness, it doesn’t work in incognito.)
[+] [-] jborichevskiy|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cenan|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] xhfloz|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] torgard|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] babblingfish|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dot5xdev|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] MarcoZavala|2 years ago|reply
[deleted]