(no title)
bn-usd-mistake | 2 years ago
I thought the reason for delaying selling of stocks is to avoid capital gains tax, not income tax.
I did a quick google, and most sources seem to support that taxes are due at RSU vesting time, e.g.
> With RSUs, you are taxed when the shares are delivered, which is almost always at vesting. Your taxable income is the market value of the shares at vesting.
https://www.schwab.com/public/eac/resources/articles/rsu_fac...
Why would this be different for the salaries of rich people? Isn't it more that they usually get large amounts of stocks at low prices if they stick with the company for a long time?
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]
nordsieck|2 years ago
Depends on the details.
For founders and early employees, the 83(b) election[1] can make a huge difference. Basically, you have the option to pay taxes on the value of the stock portion of your compensation at the time of granting, rather than when it vests. For an early stage company, that's basically $0.
I'm not 100% clear on the details, so if you're interested that's 1 good place to look.
---
1. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/1/83b-election.asp
Hendrikto|2 years ago
> ISO – no tax liability for exercising the option. You pay capital gains tax when you sell your contract or sell the stocks in your option.
> As you can see, there are tax benefits to going with the ISO – you don’t pay any ordinary income tax at any point.
ISO = Incentive Stock Option
https://www.vectorvest.com/blog/options/how-are-stock-option...
filoleg|2 years ago
The second you convert it to actual money by selling, you get hit with taxes (or Nintendo standing behind your shoulder), and you pay off your responsibilities using a chunk of money you've just received.
singleshot_|2 years ago
(They might have if they were over the $12.02m lifetime gift limit but they probably weren’t if they had $12.02m to give away).