[206lol]

Many people say ACAB for this specific reason - cops work for moneyed interests. To be a cop is to defend the wealthy and corporate, axiomatically. Plenty of cops are nice people, but they're working for a system that fundamentally is bad.

[CapstanRoller]

>Plenty of cops are nice people, but they're working for a system that fundamentally is bad.

How nice can you really be if you sign up for, and continue to work within, such a awful institution?

[mindslight]

The exact same way so many programmers can sign up for and continue to work for Surveillance Valley?

If you want to say ACAB go right ahead - there's certainly truth in that. But there is also a truth in seeing that many cops got into it because they wanted to help people, and you're going to have to work with that if you ever want to fix the system.

[all2]

What's the solution, then? If central authority is Bad (TM), is it decentralized authority that is the solution? IE, everyone gets a gun, everyone is deputized, everyone is responsible for upholding the law as citizens and enforcers.

[206lol]

Offload most police duties to civilian organizations who are specifically trained to do them. Traffic enforcement doesn't need a gun. Mental health crisis intervention is made worse by cops. (A yelling homeless man doesn't need a cop, they need someone trained to help with this specific issue.)

Retain a small number of cops to deal with serious crimes (homicides, etc) and disarm them except in emergencies.

We also need to tackle criminal justice reform - ensure we have sufficient public defenders, ensure people have speedy access to trials, don't lock everyone in jail while awaiting trial, don't pressure people to plead guilty to crimes they didn't commit just so they can keep out of jail. Reprioritize minor offenses - who cares if someone has pot, why are we spending any time on it?

[cbozeman]

Yes.

That's how it was done prior to the 1800s.