[cogitoergofutuo]

> It says nothing about the CIA covering up an involvement in 9/11

The title doesn’t say that the CIA was involved in 9/11.

[GavinMcG]

No, not literally. But a "9/11 coverup" suggests a coverup about the substance of the events on 9/11, rather than a coverup about the extent or manner of intelligence operations that preceded it. Calling it a "pre-9/11 intelligence gathering coverup" would be more helpful.

[jborden13]

But it's implied. Should be rewritten to '9/11 mishandling coverup' or some other noun to negate the click bait.

[philosopher1234]

but lets not pretend that's not on peoples minds when they read the title. it seems like it ought to be going out of its way to avoid that implication.

[cogitoergofutuo]

I did not interpret the headline that way. I’m not sure why someone would jump straight to that aside from the “Bush did 9/11” memes that get circulated every now and then.