(no title)
netzego | 2 years ago
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-core_model
I rather go with this definition. Opensource != opencore. Despite this, you're right, that is the license for `ee` folder.
netzego | 2 years ago
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-core_model
I rather go with this definition. Opensource != opencore. Despite this, you're right, that is the license for `ee` folder.
OJFord|2 years ago
Where 'open core' is to be scathingly applied and '!= open source' etc. is, IMO, when you have a system with only some piece open, and other integral pieces not. Like an open backend but closed source clients, keys required so a third-party client wouldn't work anyway, etc.
verdverm|2 years ago
> The open-core model is a business model for the monetization of commercially produced open-source software.
The open core movement is about finding a way to financially support open source development so people can eat and work on open source. It is quite obvious that the model which makes some of the code open source and some of the code not, is the best model we have right now. Some of the best open source is produced by these for profit companies. What are the alternatives? We'll before this model gained popularity, there was low quality open source or closed source alternatives for many of the projects we enjoy and see competition amongst today. All of this leads to a more vibrant software ecosystem.
Do you support open source in words or money?
xbar|2 years ago
robertlagrant|2 years ago
rapnie|2 years ago