top | item 35900994 (no title) netzego | 2 years ago not mine but wikipedia definition. you can fight with the wikipedia guys about yours. good luck with it. discuss order hn newest unknown|2 years ago [deleted] dingledork69|2 years ago Wikipedia is not an authorative source and the open source foundation is just some people who decided to name their org that. foverzar|2 years ago But there is no contradiction to wikipedia definition. The fact that there are optional non-OSS components doesn't make the whole thing non-OSS.It's not that different to using linux with non-OSS modules.
dingledork69|2 years ago Wikipedia is not an authorative source and the open source foundation is just some people who decided to name their org that.
foverzar|2 years ago But there is no contradiction to wikipedia definition. The fact that there are optional non-OSS components doesn't make the whole thing non-OSS.It's not that different to using linux with non-OSS modules.
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]
dingledork69|2 years ago
foverzar|2 years ago
It's not that different to using linux with non-OSS modules.