(no title)
gadrev | 2 years ago
It had a 94% failure rate, but I got to pass on the first attempt because Gil's free lectures of his LA course made me intuitively understand the stuff we were being taught in that course, which was very dry and IMO poorly explained, at least for freshmen. Don't think I would have dodged the bullet otherwise.
Thanks Gil.
MisterBastahrd|2 years ago
caddemon|2 years ago
fsckboy|2 years ago
it's a bit like the old "the more I know, the more I know I don't know" but with an addition of "the more I know exactly what I know, and exactly what I don't" and it's then applied via theory-of-mind, "the more I know precisely what I can teach you"
kevviiinn|2 years ago
xupybd|2 years ago
I did very well in that paper.
klysm|2 years ago
mynameisash|2 years ago
I didn't do great in the course, and when it was done, I was pretty happy this useless subject was behind me.
It wasn't until several years into my profession that I learned how important linear algebra truly is. I now work very closely with tons of data scientists, and I still feel like I should go back and learn it better.
flashgordon|2 years ago
sitkack|2 years ago
Weeder courses shouldn’t exist, they are immoral. Glad you survived yours.
poslathian|2 years ago
Now that I am, it seems kinder to fail people early out of paths they are ill suited to follow, no?