(no title)
somebody78978 | 2 years ago
And then you can use voice to text to text her back, and she can hear it in your voice! It's just like a phone call from 30 years ago, but one that requires infinitely more processing power!
somebody78978 | 2 years ago
And then you can use voice to text to text her back, and she can hear it in your voice! It's just like a phone call from 30 years ago, but one that requires infinitely more processing power!
elicash|2 years ago
It's worth noting this is already how iPhones work and people already love it. What I'm suggesting additionally is substituting Siri's voice for a DIFFERENT customized synthetic voice in a very specific circumstance. I'm not advocating for using synthetic voices where there currently aren't any here.
JumpCrisscross|2 years ago
There are folks who couldn’t, for a variety of reasons, do that thirty years ago. This feature is for them. The rest of us get to e.g. more naturally text a response to a call we’re listening into on a flight.
reaperducer|2 years ago
throwaway54_56|2 years ago
Disagree that it's the same at all. Sending discrete messages at your leisure is quite a different experience than a real-time conversation.
Someone|2 years ago
See it as data compression on the wire.
reaperducer|2 years ago
And latency!