(no title)
willtheperson | 2 years ago
Obviously, it'd be great to limit the production of more CO2 going forward but I don't believe that everyone will collectively just give up.
willtheperson | 2 years ago
Obviously, it'd be great to limit the production of more CO2 going forward but I don't believe that everyone will collectively just give up.
whatever230522|2 years ago
We are currently pumping every day 35 billion tons of carbon into an atmosphere that already has umpteen billions of tons of carbon that needs to be removed. We are never going to have machinery or technology that can remove carbon at the necessary scale. And not only is the volume an impossibility, the energy requirements are, too: it will require more energy to remove the carbon than it provided in the first place.
Best I can figure is we need to use fast-growing solar-powered organics. Replace corn with hemp, or grow algae, something like that, and sequester the mature product at an active subduction zone. Return it back into the deep earth.
sho_hn|2 years ago
c0nfused|2 years ago
Hitting the 2100 target 70 years early should be a wake up call to us all.
I see little evidence we will even attempt to cut our output and less that we will pay money to solve this issue before we have global disaster.
baggy_trough|2 years ago
yieldcrv|2 years ago
piyh|2 years ago