Nope. Sorry, Netflix. I paid for 4 concurrent streams and now you're reneging on your contract. I didn't care much when they constantly bumped the price either.
Been a Netflix subscriber since 2012. I don't really watch as much, but my mother occasionally watches a movie or two a month. My brother in college binges a tv show once in a while.
I know that neither of them will go out of their way to subscribe to Netflix.
This is relatively easy to handle for e.g. family sharing for Apple - everyone uses the same billing method, so it's naturally limited to people where you feel comfortable covering the cost of all their Apple digital purchases.
Netflix has no such "real-world" limit to apply that naturally covers students and other dependants, so they seem stuck with various contrived options.
I feel like # of simultaneous streams really ought to have been the natural limiter. If you're allowed two streams, it doesn't make a difference in the real world whether the two streams are to the same physical house or not.
Yep, I'm divorced and my minor son goes back and forth between his mother's house and mine on a weekly basis. I have a NF subscription and he is signed into my NF account over there on his xbox and the moment NF tries to extort additional money from me is the moment I cancel my subscription.
A tip if you travel often is to set up a wireguard tunnel to a home computer. You just need port forwarding on your router enabled. Works better than any paid VPN service for watching your local netflix and it can't be detected.
I think this might be moot. "Everyone living in that household can use Netflix wherever they are — at home, on the go, on holiday ..."[0] suggests that they'll use some mechanism other than IP to determine that there is against-terms "password sharing" going on. Probably something like device sessions instead.
Time will tell if this is the right move. Personally I can't remember the last time I watched any content that came from NF. I think the last time I even considered something on their platform was when Stranger Things season 2 was released. Maybe.
Something tells me this isn't going to go the way the would have hoped.
> Something tells me this isn't going to go the way the would have hoped.
Netflix is renowned for testing changes to the product, learning from the data, and iterating. We know that they have been testing in various markets over the last year or so.
So I'd be pretty sure that they are confident in this change.
It's interesting that jumped all the way to this, instead of working down from the accounts that log in from 20 cities, 10 cities, 3 cities, 1 city, etc.
From previous information I've seen, they'd have to physically go home once a month and use Netflix on their device there. Otherwise that device will get flagged.
We are invested in a company that does TV productions for regional markets, the content often being sold to the major streaming partners of that market. One of our partner's produced shows was a top 10 global Netflix production. Yet even they contend that Netflix's acceptance process is by far the most whimsical of them all. And with the recent shift to Americanization and wokification of content, it seems they are losing ground to Amazon Prime in regional markets. With these kinds of faux pas, I wonder if Amazon won't eat their lunch (and their daily bread) very soon.
I think the price is fair for the amount of content, but my family has been considering leaving Netflix to cut down on screen time and save a few bucks. I picked up YT premium, which saves me a lot of time waiting to skip ads. I wish they had this when I was a kid with the 13 VHF and 52 UHF channels in Brooklyn when I was a kid. If you buy Starbucks coffee, then Netflix is just 2 or 3 lattes a month to make up the difference! I went back to Dunkin a while ago when I don't have my thermos with me ;)
I don't think we'll turn off NFLX indefinitely, and we probably won't pause. But this might get us to consolidate with other family members. If NFLX is blessing account-sharing, then we might take them up on the offer. Going it alone is pretty expensive.
harshalizee|2 years ago
mvdtnz|2 years ago
wilg|2 years ago
You almost certainly in fact paid for 4 concurrent streams in the same household, and you were just out of compliance on your contract the whole time.
Marsymars|2 years ago
Netflix has no such "real-world" limit to apply that naturally covers students and other dependants, so they seem stuck with various contrived options.
I feel like # of simultaneous streams really ought to have been the natural limiter. If you're allowed two streams, it doesn't make a difference in the real world whether the two streams are to the same physical house or not.
remote_phone|2 years ago
alyandon|2 years ago
m4jor|2 years ago
I have 600 movies on my Plex setup and 10ish TV shows w multiple seasons.
I aint ever paying for Netflix/HBO/Apple TV/etc.
Come to the dark side
neither_color|2 years ago
lcnPylGDnU4H9OF|2 years ago
[0] https://about.netflix.com/en/news/update-on-sharing-may-us
roody15|2 years ago
fakedang|2 years ago
magic_hamster|2 years ago
Something tells me this isn't going to go the way the would have hoped.
andsoitis|2 years ago
Netflix is renowned for testing changes to the product, learning from the data, and iterating. We know that they have been testing in various markets over the last year or so.
So I'd be pretty sure that they are confident in this change.
hgsgm|2 years ago
JoshGlazebrook|2 years ago
Looks like anyone getting netflix via T-Mobile/etc are even more out of luck.
edsimpson|2 years ago
andsoitis|2 years ago
bombcar|2 years ago
leros|2 years ago
fakedang|2 years ago
eggy|2 years ago
gnicholas|2 years ago
zem|2 years ago
costanzaDynasty|2 years ago
chaosbutters314|2 years ago