top | item 36066900

Framework Laptop 16

93 points| kristianp | 2 years ago |frame.work

33 comments

order
[+] contrarian1234|2 years ago|reply
I don't understand why they dropped the 3:2 ratio for the larger model.

I thought these are targeted at professionals and not media consumption... I can't see myself going back to 16:9 or 16:10

Just seems like a dumb move. They even seem to have the space with those hideous bezels from 2010. There are tons of similar 16:10 options. It's a saturated market, while there are only a small handful of 16inch 3:2 laptops

- written from a Huawei Matebook 16

[+] pbmonster|2 years ago|reply
Their "screen deep dive" [0] mentions this bit:

> There was no existing panel that satisfied all of these needs, so we instead developed a semi-custom LCD display module with BOE, the same panel maker we use for the Framework Laptop 13. The “semi” part is that we customized the backlight for higher brightness and liquid crystal chemistry for better contrast and color gamut while leveraging an existing TFT mask set to avoid needing to pay a few million dollars in tooling fees.

So probably the existing TFT masks all where 16:9 and 16:10?

I personally would also have preferred a higher aspect ratio screen (my favorite laptop is still the IBM Thinkpad X41, which had a 4:3 display), but the other features are probably more important than... 8% more screen height.

[0] https://frame.work/blog/framework-laptop-16-deep-dive---disp...

[+] rx_tx|2 years ago|reply
It's possible they weren't able to source 16" panels in that ratio? (at a price that worked). I wouldn't exclude a different ration screen in the future maybe?
[+] xeus2001|2 years ago|reply
From the newsletter: "There was no existing panel that satisfied all of these needs, so we instead developed a semi-custom LCD display module with BOE, the same panel maker we use for the Framework Laptop 13. The “semi” part is that we customized the backlight for higher brightness and liquid crystal chemistry for better contrast and color gamut while leveraging an existing TFT mask set to avoid needing to pay a few million dollars in tooling fees." Looks like they had to make some compromise. P.S.: I personally like what they did and especially the resolution of 2k, for me the best compromise between work, video and gaming. I will for sure get one (when they support enough memory for my needs).
[+] 2muchcoffeeman|2 years ago|reply
What makes that screen ratio non professional?
[+] dankwizard|2 years ago|reply
Is your favourite handheld also the Gameboy Advance?

- Sent from my Icecream maker

[+] imdoor|2 years ago|reply
I wanted to preorder the updated 13 inch model but it turned out that in EU Framework sells their products only in a selected few countries (also they are actively preventing people from using forwarding services so there's no good way to sidestep this). It would be great if they had a distributor somewhere in the EU or something that could resell their products otherwise it might be a very long wait till they're available where I'm at.
[+] p-e-w|2 years ago|reply
The "old" Framework 13 is still not available in the vast majority of countries[1], including most of the EU (and forget about it if you live anywhere outside the Western world).

I find it pretty surprising that designing an entirely new device has higher priority for them than making sure people who don't live in one of 9 countries can buy their existing product. I get that the listed countries are huge markets, but there are also huge markets elsewhere and entering them doesn't seem to be a priority for the company at all, with snail-like progress on regional availability in the 2 years since US+Canada started shipping.

[1] https://knowledgebase.frame.work/what-countries-and-regions-...

[+] 5e92cb50239222b|2 years ago|reply
I wrote them twice asking them to at least add my country to the list (so I can be notified when they start shipping here), got two replies ("sure, try again in a couple of days"), and it's been... years? They just don't care.
[+] jitl|2 years ago|reply
Companies can do two things at the same time. The people working on sales and marketing are probably not the same people doing design and engineering.
[+] j16sdiz|2 years ago|reply
Compliant with local customer protection law and import regulations are not easy.

Unless they go rogue like china sellers, guess it won't be fix anytime soon.

[+] froh|2 years ago|reply
the EU has a number of regulations both for the product and after sales which carry an up front investment and which require some local representation. they are all good for the consumers but nevertheless they mean a barrier to entry to that market.

not sure if that is the case here but it's a plausible explanation.

[+] NoZebra120vClip|2 years ago|reply
The Chromebook version of this looks exciting. I hope driver issues will not prevent mix-and-match modules from coexisting.
[+] G3rn0ti|2 years ago|reply
A US$2000 chrome os experience? But why?

While I like ChromeOS and I believe it’s the perfect fit on low-end devices, I never quite understood the premium Chromebook market. Why would you pay so much for a device which you then can basically only use for browsing and binge watching?

[+] pazimzadeh|2 years ago|reply
> We’re excited to share our next major product category

Isn't this still in the category of laptops?