[faffffaf]

>the disease is far less effective spreading, either for not be able to infect as much people, or people not being severely impacted and being less contagious and for less time.

This idea doesn't mix well with Covid's very high rate of asymptomatic cases (which may be even higher among the vaccinated).

>A saturated health system may not be available for you if you i.e. have an accident.

At least where I live (Wales, UK), asking citizens to avoid healthcare for several years to "Save the NHS" has resulted in an ongoing health crisis of unprecedented proportions.

[TMWNN]

>>the disease is far less effective spreading, either for not be able to infect as much people, or people not being severely impacted and being less contagious and for less time.

>This idea doesn't mix well with Covid's very high rate of asymptomatic cases (which may be even higher among the vaccinated).

Indeed. Isn't it counterproductive (and also contrary to the history of public health remedies) for a "vaccine" to only reduce symptoms but not reduce infectivity? Doesn't that cause people to go to work and school when they might not have otherwise?

>At least where I live (Wales, UK), asking citizens to avoid healthcare for several years to "Save the NHS" has resulted in an ongoing health crisis of unprecedented proportions.

"Save the NHS" has a long history pre-COVID19, too. <https://twitter.com/KulganofCrydee/status/833654730849136641>

[faffffaf]

>Doesn't that cause people to go to work and school when they might not have otherwise?

Hence the absurd situation where you "need" to get vaccinated to be a good person, but you also need to keep testing, in case you leave the house while infected.