This is beautiful for grating discomfort. And for over the top insanity, there's always Z̴͔̊ͤͨ̀ͅä͚̦̯̤͟l̸̤̙̰̥̝ͭ͛ģ͍̫̙̬̪̺ͯo̧̞̖ͤͪͦ͒ ̵̗͍̩͔̀ͭͪţ̪̯̘̭̤̲̰͗͒ͩͬe̢̤̙͇̘ͩ̓ͤx̷̩̤͕̺̍ͅt̩͔̪̠̞̳̟̱͂ͦ͜
Neat. By a strange coincidence, I made something similar yesterday in a script to make each letter in HTML into a different font. I wanted to see if it would end up as an OCR-proof font:
I'm not sure if the serif-icity is the jarring part, I think it's the different point size (or whatever that word is for the horizontal height lines that fonts live within).
I'm curious why type/font technology hasn't developed for variation in letters, where a handwriting or printing typeface (or "Ransom" :) could vary the letter "a" so all the "a"'s don't look alike, the same as happens irl.
People really seem to hate "handwritten" fonts. Comic Sans is the mainstream example, but there are a lot of other ones.
As others said, stylistic alternatives definitely exist in most font packages, especially commercial ones used with Adobe products. So the fact that they are not widely used outside of graphic design probably goes back to people generally hate fonts that look handwritten for anything besides wedding invitations.
Many of the more complete font families feature stylistic alternatives for certain letters.
Usually typesetting software has you manually pick them or select sets, but it could be done as you say.
> I'm curious why type/font technology hasn't developed for variation in letters, where a handwriting or printing typeface (or "Ransom" :) could vary the letter "a" so all the "a"'s don't look alike, the same as happens irl.
Why would you want that? It seems like it would be harder to read for no benefit.
How does this work? I thought ligatures were just different glyphs stored in the font that would replace some number of other individual characters. Does that mean there’s a ligature glyph for every combination of 7 characters?!
One can get a similar, extremely ugly effect if one is reading Japanese text rendered on a Chinese language system.
Many kanjis in the Japanese text will default to the glyphs in the system Chinese font. However, the kanas as well as some kanjis are not included in the Chinese font will be rendered with a failback font, frequently in a very different style.
Something similar happens when you use Spanish accent letters (á, é, í, ó, ú, ñ) with fonts that don’t include them.
It’s amazing to me that many people seem to not notice or care that random letters don’t match the font style and they keep using those fonts for Spanish.
The biggest problem with this is that it's too obvious, if you really want to fuck with people it should require more effort for them to tell what's wrong.
An insidious little niggle that grates upon the mind.
Note that the title of the page is not "Times New Bastard" but "weiweihuanghuang/Times-New-Bastard: It's Times New Roman but every seventh letter is jarringly sans serif", which I had edited down to "Times-New-Bastard: Times New Roman but every 7th letter is jarringly sans serif".
I don’t know if it’s a thing, but I often say I have font blindness; I don’t see the difference in fonts. If I can read it, it is text and I have to really stare for ages to see what’s wrong in this case. I would happily read a book with this font and not notice anything wrong, let alone it being jarring.
Edit; same with the hellvetica example; I have to consciously stare and think to see it’s not normal; I can read it, so my brain doesn’t give two shites about the font, spacing etc.
It reminds me of lawyergrams, where the language is constructed to antagonize and threaten while still being logically and legally specific and correct - a kind of ransom note with airs. I'd wonder if some white shoe firm has gone to the trouble of commissioning an in-house font based on similar design principles to this Times New Bastard, just for that purpose.
Reminds me of how Twitter uses an odd font for @usernames where the I and 1 and l have serifs so you can tell them apart, but is otherwise sans serif. Every time I see a username with an I in it it looks weird.
I didn’t know fonts would be capable of figuring out how many had been typed in order to swap the 7th regardless of which character it was, even with ligatures. That’s kind of crazy.
I've never built a font. I had no idea you could do something procedural with them like this. I always assumed they were just a bunch of glyphs in a file.
[+] [-] ybc37|2 years ago|reply
https://web.archive.org/web/20201229053709/https://hellvetic...
[+] [-] jredwards|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jkingsman|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] yafbum|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lambdasquirrel|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] contravariant|2 years ago|reply
Would be much more annoying if every so often a letter was eve r so s|ightly wrong.
[+] [-] forgotusername6|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] userbinator|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] account-5|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Hamuko|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bonyt|2 years ago|reply
https://gist.github.com/tonyb486/0e3efc9240953c86a50a019b56c...
An example: https://tmp.tonybox.net/chbgr.htm
Rasterized and OCR'd: https://tmp.tonybox.net/ocr.pdf
[+] [-] tailspin2019|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jredwards|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] yscodes|2 years ago|reply
Big fan of on-a-whim-experiments.
[+] [-] einpoklum|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] toxik|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fsckboy|2 years ago|reply
I'm curious why type/font technology hasn't developed for variation in letters, where a handwriting or printing typeface (or "Ransom" :) could vary the letter "a" so all the "a"'s don't look alike, the same as happens irl.
[+] [-] Blahah|2 years ago|reply
Agreed! The x-height [0] (among other things) differs jarringly between the serif and sans fonts used.
0: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-height#:~:text=In%20typogr....
[+] [-] seba_dos1|2 years ago|reply
Not sure what you're talking about; it did and there are many fonts that use it.
[+] [-] mywittyname|2 years ago|reply
As others said, stylistic alternatives definitely exist in most font packages, especially commercial ones used with Adobe products. So the fact that they are not widely used outside of graphic design probably goes back to people generally hate fonts that look handwritten for anything besides wedding invitations.
[+] [-] huhtenberg|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Jeff_Brown|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] frostburg|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] yjftsjthsd-h|2 years ago|reply
Why would you want that? It seems like it would be harder to read for no benefit.
[+] [-] ryanjshaw|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] graypegg|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] qwezxcrty|2 years ago|reply
Many kanjis in the Japanese text will default to the glyphs in the system Chinese font. However, the kanas as well as some kanjis are not included in the Chinese font will be rendered with a failback font, frequently in a very different style.
[+] [-] elboru|2 years ago|reply
It’s amazing to me that many people seem to not notice or care that random letters don’t match the font style and they keep using those fonts for Spanish.
[+] [-] 1una|2 years ago|reply
There is a solution if you're using Linux: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Font_configuration/Examples...
[+] [-] bobbylarrybobby|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zerocrates|2 years ago|reply
I still see it on newspapers' websites when they're using a custom font and the headline contains an accented character.
[+] [-] yarg|2 years ago|reply
An insidious little niggle that grates upon the mind.
[+] [-] orhmeh09|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] anonzzzies|2 years ago|reply
Edit; same with the hellvetica example; I have to consciously stare and think to see it’s not normal; I can read it, so my brain doesn’t give two shites about the font, spacing etc.
[+] [-] birb07|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cyanydeez|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] m463|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] globalise83|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] fghorow|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bezier-curve|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tariqrauf|2 years ago|reply
| text-rendering: optimizeLegibility;
---
this is poetic, event potentially art
[+] [-] motohagiography|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ForOldHack|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Sohcahtoa82|2 years ago|reply
Shit, I need to change my password.
[+] [-] anthk|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] smitty1e|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Pxtl|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lloydatkinson|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] contrarian1234|2 years ago|reply
https://weiweihuanghuang.github.io/
great trollin' :))
[+] [-] DubiousPusher|2 years ago|reply