[Fgehono]

If only you would understand the context better.

Germany was not allowed to do nuclear after WW2.

German then took the Three Mile Island accident much more serious.

And later in the 80 there was tchernobyl. Even today you need to check some meat you hunted from the Bavarian forest against radiation.

Tchernobyl is part of Germans history too.

Germany has double the density of France which makes nuclear even harder to do.

I really hate comments like yours, simplifying complex things like this makes it out that we are just too stupid for nuclear... No there are reasons

[_hypx]

It isn't complex. Germany's behavior is pure phobia. Japan has an even higher population density than Germany and is still pursuing nuclear. The simply fact is, nuclear is among the safest energy source possible. With modern safety standards and Germany's lack of plate tectonics, it is basically impossible for a serious nuclear event to occur in Germany.

[Fgehono]

Ah so it's pure phobia. Interesting.

So you checked all reasons and concluded that's it?

What studies did you consult?

And even if it's 'only' phobia wouldn't it also be a problem of politics and education then?

And while I don't necessarily against nuclear, I do really believe that every investment in nuclear would be much more beneficial towards wind, solar, geo, power lines and energy storage.

Why?

Makes people more independent and therefore the country better equipped for catastrophies. It creates synergies with all other energy storage problems like ev's, laptops and smartphones.

It makes people more energy aware.

The investment will push prices down for everyone including 3th world countries.

Less risk for dirty bomb material.

No long term storage problem.

Less dependencies to other countries because Uran etc doesn't exist everywhere while the other materials are much easier to get globally.

Also castor Transports are super expensive and the whole supply chain too due to terrorism risk and health risk.

I also have worked with plenty of people in my life, the assumption that people are always able to handle dangerous materials which are not visible harmful feels stupid.

[amadeuspagel]

> Germany was not allowed to do nuclear after WW2.

How does that matter today?

> Germany has double the density of France which makes nuclear even harder to do.

Yes, same is true for any other source of energy.

[Fgehono]

It matters because it's part of our history in regards of awareness to the technology and research and development which we lacked timewise and human resources wise. People in the 60 potentially worked less on these topics in Germany than in France.

The density is relevant in point of risk.

It's easier to find empty spots in France or more very rural ones than in Germany.

Also additional to this, France is more centralized to Paris.

[tticvs]

I really hate comments like yours, trying to justify bad decisions instead of admitting you're wrong.

Of course there are reasons, they are just not good ones. They were bad then, and disastrously bad now in light of the climate change threat.

[Fgehono]

You really need to read and understand my point.

I didn't say that this is or not is a good position we are in and if it would be better or worse if we had more/much more nuclear.

The main point was that extrem simplified 'suggestions/comments' like this add 0 value. .

And your last sentence is just captain hindsight visiting...

[andromeduck]

Explain Japan.

[Fgehono]

I made my point: simplification like ops comment is shitty and there is more behind it than just 'we are stupid'.

Japan: controlled from the top. Criticism is not culturally appropriate.

For example in Japan there are not really stand up comedians who criticis other people due to culture.

This implies than it's much easier to do nuclear again independent of what the people of Japan want or not want.