top | item 36150385 (no title) brentis | 2 years ago Came here to see comments about pricing. I think inline with others.Expected a nominal 1 time fee. Probably up to $60. $30/mo is more than Photoshop. discuss order hn newest onion2k|2 years ago A comment to address the pricing that everyone is complaining about:A web designer/developer in a decent, profitable company is probably getting paid $100k at least.Assuming 250 working days a year with 8 hours a day of paid time, that's roughly $0.8/minute.If this tool saves that person 90 seconds a day finding and tweaking things in a design then it's saving more than $30/month worth of their time.It's quite cheap.The fact Adobe charge waaaaaaay too little for PS is another matter entirely. manuelmoreale|2 years ago > A web designer/developer in a decent, profitable company is probably getting paid $100k at least.In the US maybe. Definitely not here in Italy and probably in most of Europe. load replies (1) lelanthran|2 years ago > If this tool saves that person 90 seconds a day finding and tweaking things in a design then it's saving more than $30/month worth of their time.As pointed out elsewhere, it's saving the business more than $30/m, not the developer.The developer doesn't get to pocket the savings. Their reward for "saving" 4 hours a week is an extra 4 hours of work per week.
onion2k|2 years ago A comment to address the pricing that everyone is complaining about:A web designer/developer in a decent, profitable company is probably getting paid $100k at least.Assuming 250 working days a year with 8 hours a day of paid time, that's roughly $0.8/minute.If this tool saves that person 90 seconds a day finding and tweaking things in a design then it's saving more than $30/month worth of their time.It's quite cheap.The fact Adobe charge waaaaaaay too little for PS is another matter entirely. manuelmoreale|2 years ago > A web designer/developer in a decent, profitable company is probably getting paid $100k at least.In the US maybe. Definitely not here in Italy and probably in most of Europe. load replies (1) lelanthran|2 years ago > If this tool saves that person 90 seconds a day finding and tweaking things in a design then it's saving more than $30/month worth of their time.As pointed out elsewhere, it's saving the business more than $30/m, not the developer.The developer doesn't get to pocket the savings. Their reward for "saving" 4 hours a week is an extra 4 hours of work per week.
manuelmoreale|2 years ago > A web designer/developer in a decent, profitable company is probably getting paid $100k at least.In the US maybe. Definitely not here in Italy and probably in most of Europe. load replies (1)
lelanthran|2 years ago > If this tool saves that person 90 seconds a day finding and tweaking things in a design then it's saving more than $30/month worth of their time.As pointed out elsewhere, it's saving the business more than $30/m, not the developer.The developer doesn't get to pocket the savings. Their reward for "saving" 4 hours a week is an extra 4 hours of work per week.
onion2k|2 years ago
A web designer/developer in a decent, profitable company is probably getting paid $100k at least.
Assuming 250 working days a year with 8 hours a day of paid time, that's roughly $0.8/minute.
If this tool saves that person 90 seconds a day finding and tweaking things in a design then it's saving more than $30/month worth of their time.
It's quite cheap.
The fact Adobe charge waaaaaaay too little for PS is another matter entirely.
manuelmoreale|2 years ago
In the US maybe. Definitely not here in Italy and probably in most of Europe.
lelanthran|2 years ago
As pointed out elsewhere, it's saving the business more than $30/m, not the developer.
The developer doesn't get to pocket the savings. Their reward for "saving" 4 hours a week is an extra 4 hours of work per week.