[cafeoh]

> Additionally, why is it framed in a way that makes it seem like white people having more of an impact is a bad thing?

Is it really? This is definitely not the point of the article, which talk about the bias that people grow more conservative when that is at least partially explained by a survivor bias. You decide to read this as "white people bad", when the article simply highlights some democratic bias that isn't talked about that often, and I think your reaction says more about your own obsidional way of thinking than the author's.

> And it doesn't even stop there - the article implies that more diversity (i.e less white people) is an ontological good. How does this stuff even get published?

Can you please for the love of god point to me where in this article it's said that more diversity is an ontological good? Are we reading a different article altogether?